Radeon Pro V520 vs ATI X1600 XT Dual

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated217
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.03
ArchitectureUltra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameRV530Navi 12
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data1 December 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed590 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors157 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate2.360230.4
Floating-point processing powerno data7.373 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4144
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1380 MBps1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.08 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm

Pro V520 has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1600 XT Dual and Radeon Pro V520. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1600 XT Dual is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V520 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1600 XT Dual on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1600 XT Dual or Radeon Pro V520, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.