ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs ATI X1600 PRO

Place in the ranking	1356	1532
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.42	0.02
Architecture	R500 (2005−2007)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	RV530	RV280
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 October 2007 (17 years ago)	1 May 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed	500 MHz	239 MHz
Number of transistors	157 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	41 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	2.000	0.96
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	4	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	AGP 8x
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	128 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	390 MHz	164 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.48 GB/s	5.248 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	8.1
Shader Model	3.0	no data
OpenGL	2.0	1.4
OpenCL	N/A	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI X1600 PRO 0.25
+2400%

ATI 9200 PRO 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

ATI X1600 PRO 98
+4800%

ATI 9200 PRO 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.25	0.01
Recency	1 October 2007	1 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	128 MB
Chip lithography	90 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	41 Watt	28 Watt

ATI X1600 PRO has a 2400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 PRO, on the other hand, has 46.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon X1600 PRO is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9200 PRO in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.