Apple M4 40-core GPU vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1428not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.44no data
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)no data
GPU code nameRV530no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2007 (18 years ago)30 October 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors157 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)41 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed390 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.48 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)no data
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2007 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 90 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 41 Watt 45 Watt

ATI X1600 PRO has 9.8% lower power consumption.

Apple M4 40-core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1600 PRO and M4 40-core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1600 PRO is a desktop graphics card while Apple M4 40-core GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1600 PRO
Radeon X1600 PRO
Apple M4 40-core GPU
M4 40-core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 132 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 94 votes

Rate M4 40-core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1600 PRO or M4 40-core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.