UHD Graphics 630 Mobile vs ATI Radeon X1300 XT AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRV530Coffee Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 August 2006 (19 years ago)3 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors157 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)22 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00024.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs43
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xRing Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 August 2006 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 22 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 46.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1300 XT AGP and UHD Graphics 630 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1300 XT AGP is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics 630 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1300 XT AGP
Radeon X1300 XT AGP
Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 XT AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 41 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1300 XT AGP or UHD Graphics 630 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.