Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile vs ATI X1300 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1455not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.50no data
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV515Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)1 June 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed600 MHz1138 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1301 MHz
Number of transistors107 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400291.4
Floating-point processing powerno data9.326 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs4224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s409.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 1 June 2018
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 120 Watt

ATI X1300 PRO has 287% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 56 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1300 PRO and Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1300 PRO is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 35 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1300 PRO or Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.