Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded vs ATI X1300 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1444not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.50no data
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV515Raven
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)19 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data704
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1251 MHz
Number of transistors107 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate2.40055.04
Floating-point processing powerno data1.761 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 19 April 2018
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 35 Watt

ATI X1300 PRO has 12.9% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 11 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1300 PRO and Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
Radeon X1300 PRO
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 35 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1300 PRO or Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.