Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs ATI Radeon X1300 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1445not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.50no data
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameRV515Ponte Vecchio
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)10 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7168
Core clock speed600 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors107 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400694.4
Floating-point processing powerno data22.22 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs4448
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data28 MB
L2 Cacheno data204 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount128 MB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s1,229 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 10 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 300 Watt

ATI X1300 PRO has 867.7% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max 1100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1300 PRO and Data Center GPU Max 1100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1300 PRO is a desktop graphics card while Data Center GPU Max 1100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1300 PRO
Radeon X1300 PRO
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
Data Center GPU Max 1100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 35 votes

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 6 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1300 PRO or Data Center GPU Max 1100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.