Radeon Pro 575 vs ATI X1300 PRO AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRV515Polaris 20
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2005 (20 years ago)5 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed600 MHz1096 MHz
Number of transistors107 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400140.3
Floating-point processing powerno data4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs4128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s217.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2005 5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 120 Watt

ATI X1300 PRO AGP has 287% lower power consumption.

Pro 575, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1300 PRO AGP and Radeon Pro 575. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1300 PRO AGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Radeon X1300 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 99 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1300 PRO AGP or Radeon Pro 575, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.