ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP vs ATI X1050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1485not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.38no data
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameRV370RS600
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2006 (18 years ago)28 February 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz501 MHz
Number of transistors107 million120 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)24 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.6002.004
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed333 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth5.328 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.09.0b (9_2)
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2006 28 February 2007
Chip lithography 110 nm 90 nm

ATI Xpress 1200 IGP has an age advantage of 2 months, and a 22.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1050 and Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1050 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1050
Radeon X1050
ATI Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP
Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 21 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1050 or Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.