ATI Graphics Ultra + vs ATI Radeon X1050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1508not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.39no data
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)no data
GPU code nameRV370Mach32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2006 (19 years ago)1 January 1992 (34 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors107 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)24 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.600no data
ROPs41
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DRAM
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed333 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.328 GB/s80.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0None
OpenGL2.0None
OpenCLN/ANone
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2006 1 January 1992
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 800 nm

ATI X1050 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 627% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1050 and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 21 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1050 or Graphics Ultra +, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.