ATI FireMV 2200 vs ATI Radeon X1050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1503not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.39no data
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameRV370RV370
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date7 December 2006 (18 years ago)2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz324 MHz
Number of transistors107 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.6001.296
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed333 MHz392 MBps
Memory bandwidth5.328 GB/s3.136 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.09.0
OpenGL2.02.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 15 Watt

ATI FireMV 2200 has 60% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1050 and FireMV 2200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1050
Radeon X1050
ATI FireMV 2200
FireMV 2200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 21 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 6 votes

Rate FireMV 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon X1050 or FireMV 2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.