Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs ATI Radeon X1050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1437not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.37no data
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameRV370Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2006 (18 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors107 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)24 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600144.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed333 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth5.328 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2006 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 110 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 28 Watt

ATI X1050 has 16.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon X1050 and Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon X1050 is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon X1050
Radeon X1050
Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 20 votes

Rate Radeon X1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 20 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.