ATI Rage XL vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking203not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.91no data
Power efficiency7.80no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rage 3 (1997−1998)
GPU code nameVega 10Rage 3
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)1 August 1998 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1382 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate409.60.13
Floating-point processing power13.11 TFLOPSno data
ROPs641
TMUs2561
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2SDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed945 MHz83 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s664.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.1.125N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 1 August 1998
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 350 nm

Vega Frontier Edition has an age advantage of 18 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and Rage XL. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
ATI Rage XL
Rage XL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 29 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 32 votes

Rate Rage XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega Frontier Edition or Rage XL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.