Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 vs Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated434
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.01
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Vega Kaby Lake-G
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 July 2017 (8 years ago)7 January 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,489 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961280
Core clock speed1382 MHz931 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1011 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate409.6no data
Floating-point processing power13.11 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs256no data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed945 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 July 2017 7 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 65 Watt

Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX Vega M GL / 870, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 477% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled and Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 121 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled or Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.