Tesla M10 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.63
ArchitectureGCN 1.4 (2017)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameVega 10GM107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)18 May 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096640 ×4
Core clock speed1500 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate409.652.24 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data1.672 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs6416 ×4
TMUs25640 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB ×4
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed1886 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth482.8 GB/s83.2 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 225 Watt

Vega Frontier Edition Liquid has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla M10, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid and Tesla M10. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid is a desktop graphics card while Tesla M10 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
NVIDIA Tesla M10
Tesla M10

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate Tesla M10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid or Tesla M10, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.