T1000 vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.98
ArchitectureGCN 1.4 (2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10TU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)6 May 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096896
Core clock speed1500 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate409.678.12
Floating-point processing powerno data2.5 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs25656
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm156 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1886 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth482.8 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 50 Watt

Vega Frontier Edition Liquid has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid and T1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid is a desktop graphics card while T1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
NVIDIA T1000
T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 73 votes

Rate T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid or T1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.