Radeon RX 6900 vs Vega Frontier Edition Liquid

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated35
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.24
ArchitectureGCN 1.4 (2017)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)28 October 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964608
Core clock speed1500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1600 MHz2105 MHz
Number of transistorsno data23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate409.6606.2
Floating-point processing powerno data19.4 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1886 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth482.8 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 28 October 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 255 Watt

RX 6900 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 47.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid and Radeon RX 6900. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 90 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid or Radeon RX 6900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.