Radeon RX 6800M vs Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 188 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 16.66 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.4 (2017) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Vega 10 | Navi 22 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 June 2017 (8 years ago) | 31 May 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 2116 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2390 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 17,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 375 Watt | 145 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 409.6 | 382.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 12.24 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256 | 160 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 40 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 640 KB |
| L1 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 96 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1886 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 482.8 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 June 2017 | 31 May 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 375 Watt | 145 Watt |
Vega Frontier Edition Liquid has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RX 6800M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 158.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid and Radeon RX 6800M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
