Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs Vega Frontier Edition Liquid

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.4 (2017)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40963584 ×2
Core clock speed1500 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate409.6224.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data7.168 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs6464 ×2
TMUs256224 ×2
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width2048 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1886 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth482.8 GB/s483.8 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan-1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 230 Watt

Pro V320 MxGPU has 63% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid or Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.