GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh vs Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.4 (2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10TU116B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 June 2017 (8 years ago)15 May 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961536
Core clock speed1500 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Wattno data
Texture fill rate409.6152.6
Floating-point processing powerno data4.884 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs25696
L1 Cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1886 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth482.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 June 2017 15 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

Vega Frontier Edition Liquid has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 59 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Liquid or GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.