Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Vega 9 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.84
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code namePicassoVega 10
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2019 (7 years ago)19 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5764096
Core clock speed300 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate46.80375.8
Floating-point processing power1.498 TFLOPS12.03 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs36256
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 19 March 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

Vega 9 Mobile has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 64X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 9 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 64X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 9 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 9 Mobile
Radeon Vega 9 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 9 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 38 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 9 Mobile or Radeon Pro Vega 64X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.