ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT vs Vega 9 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1406
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.86
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code namePicassoRV610
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2019 (7 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores57640
Core clock speed300 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million180 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate46.802.600
Floating-point processing power1.498 TFLOPS0.052 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs364
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2019 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

Vega 9 Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 9 Mobile and Radeon HD 2400 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 9 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2400 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 9 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 47 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 9 Mobile or Radeon HD 2400 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.