UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated915
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameRavenTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 April 2018 (7 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51216
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate35.20no data
Floating-point processing power1.126 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2018 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 8 Efficient is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 84 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 8 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 391 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 8 Efficient or UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.