Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB vs Radeon Vega 8 Efficient

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRavenGV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2018 (7 years ago)26 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5125120
Core clock speed300 MHz1245 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1597 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate35.20511.0
Floating-point processing power1.126 TFLOPS16.35 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs32320
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cacheno data10 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1106 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,133 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2018 26 November 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

Vega 8 Efficient has 614.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 8 Efficient and Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 8 Efficient is a desktop graphics card while Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
Radeon Vega 8 Efficient
NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 85 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 8 Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 8 Efficient or Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.