Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile vs Radeon Vega 7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking601not rated
Place by popularity13not in top-100
Power efficiency11.45no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCezanneTU104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date13 April 2021 (4 years ago)8 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4483072 ×2
Core clock speed300 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistors9,800 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate53.20293.8 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPS9.4 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs864 ×2
TMUs28192 ×2
Tensor Coresno data384 ×2
Ray Tracing Coresno data48 ×2
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2021 8 June 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 110 Watt

Vega 7 has an age advantage of 10 months, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 144.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 7 and Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3149 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 7 or Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.