Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Vega 6 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.81
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRaven-MVega 12
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date8 January 2018 (8 years ago)14 November 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed300 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speed1101 MHz1190 MHz
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4276.16
Floating-point processing power0.8456 TFLOPS2.437 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2464
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared1024 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data307.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2018 14 November 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

Vega 6 Mobile has 400% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 16, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 6 Mobile and Radeon Pro Vega 16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 6 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 65 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 6 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 6 Mobile or Radeon Pro Vega 16, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.