Riva TNT2 vs Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1592
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameRavenNV5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2018 (7 years ago)12 October 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed300 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.260.25
Floating-point processing power0.7764 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs242

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 April 2018 12 October 1999
Chip lithography 14 nm 250 nm

Vega 6 Mobile Efficient has an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient and Riva TNT2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient is a notebook graphics card while Riva TNT2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient
Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient
NVIDIA Riva TNT2
Riva TNT2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 33 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 6 Mobile Efficient or Riva TNT2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.