Arc Pro B50 vs Radeon Vega 3 Efficient
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 194 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 47.45 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 34.32 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Xe2 (2024) |
| GPU code name | Raven | BMG-G21 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 26 May 2018 (7 years ago) | 5 September 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $349 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | 19,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 12.00 | 332.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.384 TFLOPS | 10.65 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 16 |
| TMUs | 12 | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
| L2 Cache | no data | 4 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 5.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 167 mm |
| Width | IGP | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1 |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 26 May 2018 | 5 September 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 70 Watt |
Vega 3 Efficient has 366.7% lower power consumption.
Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 3 Efficient and Arc Pro B50. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon Vega 3 Efficient is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
