Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs Sky 700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.81
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameTahitiVega 12
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date27 March 2013 (13 years ago)14 November 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921024
Core clock speed900 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate100.876.16
Floating-point processing power3.226 TFLOPS2.437 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11264
L1 Cache448 KB256 KB
L2 Cache768 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth176 GB/s307.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 March 2013 14 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 75 Watt

Sky 700 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro Vega 16, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Sky 700 and Radeon Pro Vega 16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Sky 700 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Sky 700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Sky 700 or Radeon Pro Vega 16, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.