Radeon HD 7560G IGP vs Sky 500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking459not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.80no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code namePitcairnDevastator Lite
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 March 2013 (13 years ago)15 May 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280256
Core clock speed950 MHz496 MHz
Boost clock speedno data760 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate76.0012.16
Floating-point processing power2.432 TFLOPS0.3891 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8016
L1 Cache320 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length242 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth154 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 March 2013 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

Sky 500 has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7560G IGP, on the other hand, has 328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Sky 500 and Radeon HD 7560G IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Sky 500 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7560G IGP is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 15 votes

Rate Radeon Sky 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560G IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Sky 500 or Radeon HD 7560G IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.