GeForce MX450 vs ATI Radeon SDR

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.34
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRage 6N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 June 2000 (25 years ago)1 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data896
Core clock speed166 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistors30 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate1100.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s64.03 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2000 1 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 25 Watt

ATI SDR has 8.7% lower power consumption.

GeForce MX450, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 20 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon SDR and GeForce MX450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon SDR is a desktop graphics card while GeForce MX450 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon SDR
Radeon SDR
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon SDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1418 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon SDR or GeForce MX450, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.