GeForce GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon SDR

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 6 (2000−2007)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRage 6GT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 June 2000 (25 years ago)27 November 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data216
Core clock speed166 MHz576 MHz
Number of transistors30 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt171 Watt
Texture fill rate141.47
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5365 TFLOPS
ROPs228
TMUs672
L2 Cacheno data224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB896 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz999 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2000 27 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 896 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 171 Watt

ATI SDR has 643.5% lower power consumption.

GTX 260 216 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 2700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 227.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon SDR and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon SDR
Radeon SDR
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon SDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon SDR or GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.