Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs Radeon RX Vega Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated763
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.40
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameVega MobileBroadwell GT3e
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2018 (8 years ago)5 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792384
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data38.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2018 5 September 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Mobile and Iris Pro Graphics P6300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 410 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega Mobile or Iris Pro Graphics P6300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.