UHD Graphics 610 vs Radeon RX Vega XTX

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated910
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.63
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Coffee Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 August 2017 (7 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409696
Core clock speed1500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1630 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate417.310.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1728 TFLOPS
ROPs642
TMUs25612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1890 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 3 April 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 610 has an age advantage of 7 months, and 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega XTX and UHD Graphics 610. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega XTX is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 610 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega XTX
Radeon RX Vega XTX
Intel UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX Vega XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 642 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.