Radeon Pro 5700 vs RX Vega XTX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated235
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.22
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 August 2017 (8 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962304
Core clock speed1500 MHz1243 MHz
Boost clock speed1630 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate417.3194.4
Floating-point processing powerno data6.221 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs256144
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 130 Watt

Pro 5700 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 73% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega XTX and Radeon Pro 5700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega XTX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5700 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega XTX or Radeon Pro 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.