Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile vs RX Vega XTX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10Lucienne
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 August 2017 (8 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096512
Core clock speed1500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1630 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate417.360.80
Floating-point processing powerno data1.946 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs25632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1890 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 25 Watt

Graphics 512SP Mobile has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega XTX and Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega XTX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega XTX
Radeon RX Vega XTX
AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega XTX or Radeon Graphics 512SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.