GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX Vega XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameVega 10GT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 August 2017 (8 years ago)17 April 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409616
Core clock speed1500 MHz520 MHz
Boost clock speed1630 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data260 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate417.34.160
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs2568
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.011.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 40 Watt

RX Vega XT has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 462.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega XT and GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
Radeon RX Vega XT
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 11 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega XT or GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.