Arctic Sound-M vs Radeon RX Vega XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameVega 10Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 August 2017 (7 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40968192
Core clock speed1500 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1630 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate417.3230.4
Floating-point processing powerno data14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs256256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 500 Watt

RX Vega XT has 122.2% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega XT and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega XT is a desktop card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
Radeon RX Vega XT
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX Vega XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.