Tegra 2 vs Radeon RX Vega XL
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013) |
| GPU code name | Vega 10 | Tegra 2 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 August 2017 (8 years ago) | 3 June 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1630 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 365.1 | 1.600 |
| ROPs | 64 | 4 |
| TMUs | 224 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12.0 | N/A |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | ES 2.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 August 2017 | 3 June 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 20 Watt |
RX Vega XL has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.
Tegra 2, on the other hand, has 1025% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega XL and Tegra 2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega XL is a desktop graphics card while Tegra 2 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
