P102-101 vs Radeon RX Vega XL

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVega 10GP102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 August 2017 (8 years ago)2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35843200
Core clock speed1500 MHz1557 MHz
Boost clock speed1630 MHz1670 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate365.1334.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.69 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs224200
L1 Cacheno data1.2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2.5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB10 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s320.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 250 Watt

RX Vega XL has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

P102-101, on the other hand, has a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega XL and P102-101. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega XL is a desktop graphics card while P102-101 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega XL
Radeon RX Vega XL
NVIDIA P102-101
P102-101

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX Vega XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate P102-101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega XL or P102-101, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.