ION vs Radeon RX Vega XL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1424
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.00
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameVega 10C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 August 2017 (8 years ago)18 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358416
Core clock speed1500 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1630 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate365.13.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs2248
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1890 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 18 June 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 20 Watt

RX Vega XL has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

ION, on the other hand, has 1025% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega XL and ION. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega XL is a desktop graphics card while ION is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX Vega XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 23 votes

Rate ION on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega XL or ION, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.