GRID M6-8Q vs Radeon RX Vega XL

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.48
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameVega 10GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 August 2017 (8 years ago)30 August 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841536
Core clock speed1500 MHz722 MHz
Boost clock speed1630 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate365.169.31
Floating-point processing powerno data2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs22496

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1890 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth483.8 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 August 2017 30 August 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 100 Watt

RX Vega XL has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GRID M6-8Q, on the other hand, has 125% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega XL and GRID M6-8Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega XL is a desktop graphics card while GRID M6-8Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega XL
Radeon RX Vega XL
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
GRID M6-8Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX Vega XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M6-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega XL or GRID M6-8Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.