ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition vs RX Vega Nano

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameVega 10R580+
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data19 January 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$788

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1200 MHz670 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million384 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate395.810.72
ROPs6416
TMUs25616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length152 mm230 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MBps1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s67.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x VHDCI
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.73.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 125 Watt

RX Vega Nano has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1950 XTX Uber Edition, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Nano and Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega Nano or Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.