Radeon Instinct MI300 vs RX Vega Nano

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10Aqua Vanjaram
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data4 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409614080
Core clock speed1200 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate395.81,496
Floating-point processing powerno data47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs64no data
TMUs256880
Tensor Coresno data880
L1 Cacheno data3.4 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length152 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MBps1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s3,277 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.7N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 600 Watt

RX Vega Nano has 243% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Nano and Radeon Instinct MI300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega Nano is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI300 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 27 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega Nano or Radeon Instinct MI300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.