GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX Vega Nano
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 372 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 24.01 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Vega 10 | TU117 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 2 April 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1546 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 12,500 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 175 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 395.8 | 76.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 2.458 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 32 |
| TMUs | 256 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 152 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MBps | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.2.140 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 175 Watt | 50 Watt |
RX Vega Nano has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Nano and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX Vega Nano is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
