Arc B370 vs Radeon RX Vega Nano

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameVega 10Panther Lake
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961280
Core clock speed1200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1546 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate395.896.00
Floating-point processing powerno data6.144 TFLOPS
ROPs6420
TMUs25640
Ray Tracing Coresno data10
L1 Cacheno data640 KB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2048 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1600 MBpsSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 25 Watt

Arc B370 has a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega Nano and Arc B370. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega Nano is a desktop graphics card while Arc B370 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc B370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega Nano or Arc B370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.