UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency80.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameVegaIce Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)29 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512256
Core clock speed720 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate38.0814.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPRing Bus
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 29 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 17 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.