ATI Rage 128 VR AGP vs Radeon RX Vega M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency80.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameVegaRage 4
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)1 August 1998 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed720 MHz80 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,500 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate38.080.16
ROPs82
TMUs322

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 2x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.06.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 1 August 1998
Chip lithography 14 nm 250 nm

RX Vega M has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and Rage 128 VR AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Rage 128 VR AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or Rage 128 VR AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.