RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs Radeon RX Vega M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency80.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVegaAD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123072
Core clock speed720 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate38.08139.7
Floating-point processing powerno data8.94 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs3296
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

RX Vega M has 133% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop graphics card while RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.