Quadro K2000M Embedded vs Radeon RX Vega M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking377not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency80.44no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameVegaEXK107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2018 (8 years ago)22 March 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speed720 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speed1190 MHz1058 MHz
Number of transistors4,500 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate38.0833.86
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3232
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.011.0 (11_0)
Shader Model5.05.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 22 March 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

RX Vega M has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M
Radeon RX Vega M
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega M or Quadro K2000M Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.